Cookies must be enabled for this site to function properly

Dangerous properties are putting tenants at risk

0 helpful votes
This is the number of people who have indicated that they have found this discussion useful.
last updated: 26 May 2016 report a problem

dangerous properties are putting tenants at risk

The recent case of a Reading landlord who was fined £12,000 for failing to maintain a rental property, is just one example of growing problem of dangerous properties that are putting tenants at risk, according to the Association of Independent Inventory Clerks (AIIC).

Ravinder Singh Takhar, 57, was recently prosecuted under the Housing Act and Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act for failing to comply with regulations in respect of managing HMOs and one of failing to provide information in respect of a property.  Takhar, a millionaire, owned and let a house which had been converted into four flats. The  fire extinguisher had not been tested since November 2006, the rear garden had become overgrown with several discarded household items in it and a gap in metal railing at the front of the house was wide enough for a small child to fall through and down to the basement flat.

The most common dangers found in properties are severe damp and mould; bare wiring; broken windows; dilapidated sheds; overgrown gardens with concealed barbed wire, broken glass and holes in the ground; large wardrobes and cupboards not securely fixed to the wall; unserviced and faulty boilers; damaged and leaning brick walls; no keys for window locks; and no smoke alarms fitted.

Pat Barber, Chair of the AIIC comments: “It is an unfortunate truth in the UK, many disadvantaged tenants are put in danger by unscrupulous landlords who exploit their vulnerability.  Some of these tenants have to live in properties, full of dangerous hazards which put their safety at risk.  We have seen no end of dangerous hazards in a range of properties including faulty gas boilers and fires; excessive mould throughout the property; exposed electric wiring; gardens littered with rusty car parts and other metal items; and faulty fire alarms.

“In one recent property, during an end of tenancy check out inspection, the inventory clerk discovered a completely overgrown garden pond which was so hidden, she almost fell into it. The garden shed was so dilapidated that it leant at an alarming angle and could have collapsed at any time. It was impossible to open the door to reach any gardening equipment and also posed a serious safety hazard to the tenants.

“Many families and young children are at risk from negligent landlords, all of whom have a ‘duty of care’ and as such, should be making regular visits to properties – every three months – to check health and safety.”

The AIIC has outlined the recommended time scales for landlords to respond to a request for repairs.  Depending on the problem, some need to be treated more urgently than others:

– Emergency response – gas and water leaks, serious electrical faults.

– 24 hour response – heating and water systems and other non life threatening electrical problems eg broken windows if not caused by tenant negligence.

– 72 hour response – kitchen appliances and other items that affect the daily life of a tenant.

– Less urgent responses would include things like broken lawn mowers, a fallen fence panel or a dripping tap.

The AIIC is committed to excellence and professionalism in the property inventory process and works hard to ensure that all landlords, tenants and letting agents understand the importance and benefits of professionally completed property inventories.

For further information on AIIC, please visit

Source:  Letting Agent Today

Image Source